Pentium 4 P4 3.0 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Primary details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | Pentium 4 |
| Architecture codename | Merom-2M (2008) | Northwood (2002−2004) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | 400 MHz |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | P | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 89 Watt |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 89 Watt |
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 154.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is a notebook processor while Pentium 4 P4 3.0 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
