Ultra 7 268V vs Celeron D 352

Place in the ranking	3262	458
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Power efficiency	0.19	84.06
Architecture codename	Cedar Mill (2006)	Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date	May 2006 (18 years ago)	24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron D 352 and Core Ultra 7 268V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	8 (Octa-Core)
Threads	1	8
Base clock speed	3.2 GHz	2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.2 GHz	5 GHz
Bus rate	no data	37 MHz
L1 cache	16 KB	192 KB (per core)
L2 cache	512 KB	2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache	0 KB	12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	65 nm	3 nm
Die size	109 mm²	no data
Maximum core temperature	69 °C	100 °C
Number of transistors	125 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data
VID voltage range	1.25V-1.325V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron D 352 and Core Ultra 7 268V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	PLGA775	Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)	86 Watt	17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron D 352 and Core Ultra 7 268V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	-	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
TSX	-	+
Idle States	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
PAE	32 Bit	no data
FSB parity	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron D 352 and Core Ultra 7 268V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	+
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron D 352 and Core Ultra 7 268V are enumerated here.

VT-d	no data	+
VT-x	-	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron D 352 and Core Ultra 7 268V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

Arc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron D 352 and Core Ultra 7 268V.

PCIe version	no data	5.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	4

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.17	15.10
Physical cores	1	8
Threads	1	8
Chip lithography	65 nm	3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	86 Watt	17 Watt

Ultra 7 268V has a 8782.4% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process, and 405.9% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 268V is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron D 352 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron D 352 is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 7 268V is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron D 352 and Core Ultra 7 268V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.