Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Celeron D 352

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron D 352
2006
1 core / 1 thread, 86 Watt
0.17
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 89 Watt
0.50
+194%

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ outperforms Celeron D 352 by a whopping 194% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron D 352 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32752896
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.190.53
Architecture codenameCedar Mill (2006)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release dateMay 2006 (18 years ago)May 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron D 352 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cache16 KB256 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
Die size109 mm2220 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Number of transistors125 million154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.25V-1.325Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron D 352 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPLGA775AM2
Power consumption (TDP)86 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron D 352 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron D 352 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron D 352 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron D 352 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron D 352 0.17
Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 0.50
+194%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron D 352 274
Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 789
+188%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 0.50
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 86 Watt 89 Watt

Celeron D 352 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 3.5% lower power consumption.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+, on the other hand, has a 194.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron D 352 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron D 352 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron D 352
Celeron D 352
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+
Athlon 64 X2 5000+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 35 votes

Rate Celeron D 352 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 218 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron D 352 or Athlon 64 X2 5000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.