Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs Celeron D 350
Primary details
Comparing Celeron D 350 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 27 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 6.35 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen Threadripper |
| Power efficiency | no data | 17.81 |
| Architecture codename | Prescott (2001−2005) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| Release date | June 2005 (19 years ago) | 14 July 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $5,500 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron D 350 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 128 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 27 |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 256 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Die size | 109 mm2 | 74 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 67 °C | 95 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 125 million | 3,800 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 1.25V-1.4V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron D 350 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | sWRX8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron D 350 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron D 350 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron D 350 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron D 350 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.8 GB/s |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron D 350 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 64 |
| Threads | 1 | 128 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 280 Watt |
Celeron D 350 has 283.6% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, on the other hand, has 6300% more physical cores and 12700% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron D 350 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron D 350 is a desktop processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron D 350 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
