Pentium 4 630 vs Celeron D 350

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron D 350 and Pentium 4 630 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataPentium 4
Architecture codenamePrescott (2001−2005)Prescott 2M
Release dateJune 2005 (19 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron D 350 and Pentium 4 630 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads12
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache16 KBno data
L2 cache256 KBno data
L3 cache0 KB2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
Die size109 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature67 °C67 °C
Number of transistors125 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.25V-1.4V1.2V-1.4V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron D 350 and Pentium 4 630 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPPGA478PLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt84 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron D 350 and Pentium 4 630. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States--
Demand Based Switching--
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Celeron D 350 and Pentium 4 630 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron D 350 and Pentium 4 630 are enumerated here.

VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron D 350 and Pentium 4 630. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2no data

Pros & cons summary


Threads 1 2
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 84 Watt

Celeron D 350 has 15.1% lower power consumption.

Pentium 4 630, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron D 350 and Pentium 4 630. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron D 350 and Pentium 4 630, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron D 350
Celeron D 350
Intel Pentium 4 630
Pentium 4 630

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 12 votes

Rate Celeron D 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 125 votes

Rate Pentium 4 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron D 350 or Pentium 4 630, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.