Atom Z3770 vs Celeron D 340

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron D 340 and Atom Z3770 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Architecture codenamePrescott (2001−2005)Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
Release dateSeptember 2004 (20 years ago)27 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$37

Detailed specifications

Celeron D 340 and Atom Z3770 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speed2.93 GHz1.46 GHz
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz2.39 GHz
L1 cache16 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm22 nm
Die size109 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature67 °C90 °C
Number of transistors125 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.25V-1.4Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron D 340 and Atom Z3770 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478UTFCBGA1380
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt8 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron D 340 and Atom Z3770. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron D 340 and Atom Z3770 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB-no data
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron D 340 and Atom Z3770 are enumerated here.

VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron D 340 and Atom Z3770. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17.1 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 8 Watt

Atom Z3770 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 812.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron D 340 and Atom Z3770. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron D 340 is a desktop processor while Atom Z3770 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron D 340 and Atom Z3770, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron D 340
Celeron D 340
Intel Atom Z3770
Atom Z3770

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 12 votes

Rate Celeron D 340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 19 votes

Rate Atom Z3770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron D 340 or Atom Z3770, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.