Celeron 2.0 vs D 330

Primary details

Comparing Celeron D 330 and Celeron 2.0 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenamePrescott (2001−2005)Northwood (2002−2004)
Release dateJune 2004 (20 years ago)September 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron D 330 and Celeron 2.0 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed2.66 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache16 KB8 KB
L2 cache256 KB128 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm130 nm
Die size109 mm2146 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
Number of transistors125 million55 million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.25V-1.4Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron D 330 and Celeron 2.0 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478478
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt73 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron D 330 and Celeron 2.0. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron D 330 and Celeron 2.0 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron D 330 and Celeron 2.0 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron D 330 and Celeron 2.0. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR1, DDR2

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 130 nm

Celeron D 330 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron D 330 and Celeron 2.0. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron D 330 and Celeron 2.0, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron D 330
Celeron D 330
Intel Celeron 2.0
Celeron 2.0

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 34 votes

Rate Celeron D 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 9 votes

Rate Celeron 2.0 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron D 330 or Celeron 2.0, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.