Celeron M 440 vs D 326

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron D 326 and Celeron M 440 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated3375
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataCeleron M
Power efficiencyno data0.39
Architecture codenamePrescott (2001−2005)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release dateSeptember 2004 (20 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron D 326 and Celeron M 440 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed2.53 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz1.86 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cache16 KBno data
L2 cache256 KBno data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography90 nm65 nm
Die size109 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature68 °C100 °C
Number of transistors125 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.25V-1.4V1.0V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron D 326 and Celeron M 440 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPLGA478,PLGA775PBGA479,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)84 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron D 326 and Celeron M 440. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)--
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+-
Demand Based Switching--
PAE32 Bit32 Bit
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Celeron D 326 and Celeron M 440 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron D 326 and Celeron M 440 are enumerated here.

VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron D 326 and Celeron M 440. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt 27 Watt

Celeron M 440 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 211.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron D 326 and Celeron M 440. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron D 326 is a desktop processor while Celeron M 440 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron D 326 and Celeron M 440, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron D 326
Celeron D 326
Intel Celeron M 440
Celeron M 440

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 82 votes

Rate Celeron D 326 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 12 votes

Rate Celeron M 440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron D 326 or Celeron M 440, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.