Itanium 9350 vs Celeron D 325

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron D 325 and Itanium 9350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenamePrescott (2001−2005)no data
Release dateJune 2004 (20 years ago)1 January 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron D 325 and Itanium 9350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speed2.53 GHz1.73 GHz
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz1.87 GHz
L1 cache16 KBno data
L2 cache256 KBno data
L3 cache0 KB24 MB L3 Cache
Chip lithography90 nm65 nm
Die size109 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
Number of transistors125 millionno data
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.25V-1.4Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron D 325 and Itanium 9350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPPGA478FCLGA1248
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron D 325 and Itanium 9350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-1.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States-no data
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-+
PAE32 Bit50 Bit
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron D 325 and Itanium 9350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron D 325 and Itanium 9350 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron D 325 and Itanium 9350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 185 Watt

Celeron D 325 has 153.4% lower power consumption.

Itanium 9350, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron D 325 and Itanium 9350. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron D 325 is a desktop processor while Itanium 9350 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron D 325 and Itanium 9350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron D 325
Celeron D 325
Intel Itanium 9350
Itanium 9350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 18 votes

Rate Celeron D 325 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Itanium 9350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron D 325 or Itanium 9350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.