Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS vs Celeron B860E
Primary details
Comparing Celeron B860E and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 529 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
Power efficiency | no data | 46.90 |
Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Hawk Point (2024) |
Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 16 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron B860E and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 12 |
Base clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 21 | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 2 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
Die size | 131 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
Number of transistors | 504 Million | 25,000 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron B860E and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | no data | FP7 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B860E and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B860E and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B860E and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | AMD Radeon 760M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B860E and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS.
PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
Threads | 2 | 12 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS has 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron B860E and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B860E and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.