Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U vs Celeron B840
Primary details
Comparing Celeron B840 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2804 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Celeron | Ryzen 3 |
Power efficiency | 1.63 | no data |
Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Zen (2017−2020) |
Release date | 1 July 2011 (13 years ago) | 7 January 2018 (7 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron B840 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.5 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 19 | no data |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 192 KB |
L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 4 MB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 131 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 504 million | 4500 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron B840 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
Socket | G2 (988B) | AM4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B840 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
FMA | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Security technologies
Celeron B840 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B840 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U are enumerated here.
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B840 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 950 MHz) | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 0.34 | 2.99 |
Recency | 1 July 2011 | 7 January 2018 |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U has 779.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron B840 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B840 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.