Solo T1200 vs Celeron B820

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron B820
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.50
+213%
Core Solo T1200
2006
1 core / 1 thread, 27 Watt
0.16

Celeron B820 outperforms Core Solo T1200 by a whopping 213% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron B820 and Core Solo T1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28853300
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronCore Solo
Power efficiency1.340.56
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date1 July 2012 (12 years ago)January 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron B820 and Core Solo T1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s667 MHz
Multiplier17no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size131 mm290 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million151 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B820 and Core Solo T1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988479
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B820 and Core Solo T1200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron B820 and Core Solo T1200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B820 and Core Solo T1200 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B820 and Core Solo T1200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron B820 and Core Solo T1200 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B820 and Core Solo T1200.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.50 0.16
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 27 Watt

Celeron B820 has a 212.5% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Solo T1200, on the other hand, has 29.6% lower power consumption.

The Celeron B820 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Solo T1200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B820 and Core Solo T1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B820
Celeron B820
Intel Core Solo T1200
Core Solo T1200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 142 votes

Rate Celeron B820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 2 votes

Rate Core Solo T1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron B820 or Core Solo T1200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.