Pentium P6200 vs Celeron B815

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron B815
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.46
Pentium P6200
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.57
+23.9%

Pentium P6200 outperforms Celeron B815 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron B815 and Pentium P6200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29232813
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Pentium
Power efficiency1.241.54
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date1 January 2012 (12 years ago)26 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$60

Detailed specifications

Celeron B815 and Pentium P6200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz0.13 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0DMI 1.0
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplier1616
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size131 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Number of transistors504 million384 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B815 and Pentium P6200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B815 and Pentium P6200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
FMA++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Demand Based Switching--
PAEno data36 Bit
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Celeron B815 and Pentium P6200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B815 and Pentium P6200 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B815 and Pentium P6200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s17.051 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron B815 and Pentium P6200 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B815 and Pentium P6200.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron B815 0.46
Pentium P6200 0.57
+23.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron B815 731
Pentium P6200 908
+24.2%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron B815 243
Pentium P6200 285
+17.3%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron B815 413
Pentium P6200 479
+16%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron B815 2093
Pentium P6200 2394
+14.4%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron B815 4029
Pentium P6200 4620
+14.7%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron B815 1645
Pentium P6200 1949
+18.5%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron B815 44.3
Pentium P6200 32.47
+36.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.46 0.57
Recency 1 January 2012 26 September 2010

Celeron B815 has an age advantage of 1 year.

Pentium P6200, on the other hand, has a 23.9% higher aggregate performance score.

The Pentium P6200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron B815 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B815 and Pentium P6200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B815
Celeron B815
Intel Pentium P6200
Pentium P6200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 250 votes

Rate Celeron B815 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 303 votes

Rate Pentium P6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron B815 or Pentium P6200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.