Celeron 897 vs B815
Primary details
Comparing Celeron B815 and Celeron 897 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2923 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Celeron | Intel Celeron |
Power efficiency | 1.24 | no data |
Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
Release date | 1 January 2012 (12 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron B815 and Celeron 897 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 2.0 | DMI 2.0 |
Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | 4 × 5 GT/s |
Multiplier | 16 | 16 |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 2 MB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | 131 mm2 | 131 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 504 million | 504 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron B815 and Celeron 897 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | FCPGA988,PGA988 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B815 and Celeron 897. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
FMA | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
My WiFi | - | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
FDI | + | no data |
Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron B815 and Celeron 897 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B815 and Celeron 897 are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B815 and Celeron 897. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3-1333 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | 21.335 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
Graphics max frequency | 1.05 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron B815 and Celeron 897 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
SDVO | + | no data |
CRT | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B815 and Celeron 897.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 0.77 | 0.34 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 17 Watt |
Celeron B815 has 126.5% faster integrated GPU.
Celeron 897, on the other hand, has 105.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron B815 and Celeron 897. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B815 and Celeron 897, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.