VIA Nano U2250 vs Celeron B800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron B800
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.42
+282%
VIA Nano U2250
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 10 Watt
0.11

Celeron B800 outperforms VIA Nano U2250 by a whopping 282% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron B800 and VIA Nano U2250 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29903369
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronVIA Nano
Power efficiency1.131.04
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Isaiah (2009)
Release date19 June 2011 (13 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron B800 and VIA Nano U2250 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s800 MHz
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B800 and VIA Nano U2250 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketG2 (988B)NanoBGA2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B800 and VIA Nano U2250. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Celeron B800 and VIA Nano U2250 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B800 and VIA Nano U2250 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B800 and VIA Nano U2250. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron B800 0.42
+282%
VIA Nano U2250 0.11

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron B800 663
+270%
VIA Nano U2250 179

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron B800 1910
+115%
VIA Nano U2250 888

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron B800 47
+270%
VIA Nano U2250 174

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 0.11
Recency 19 June 2011 1 January 2009
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 10 Watt

Celeron B800 has a 281.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

VIA Nano U2250, on the other hand, has 250% lower power consumption.

The Celeron B800 is our recommended choice as it beats the VIA Nano U2250 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B800 and VIA Nano U2250, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B800
Celeron B800
VIA Nano U2250
Nano U2250

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 193 votes

Rate Celeron B800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 22 votes

Rate VIA Nano U2250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron B800 or VIA Nano U2250, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.