Ryzen 7 7700 vs Celeron B800

Primary details

Comparing Celeron B800 and Ryzen 7 7700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated238
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data48.72
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiencyno data31.75
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
Release date19 June 2011 (13 years ago)14 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80$339

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron B800 and Ryzen 7 7700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed1.5 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz5.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size131 mm271 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistors504 million6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B800 and Ryzen 7 7700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCPGA988AM5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65W, (85W real world)

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B800 and Ryzen 7 7700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.25 nm, 0.650 - 1.475V
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron B800 and Ryzen 7 7700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B800 and Ryzen 7 7700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B800 and Ryzen 7 7700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size16 GB128 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron B800 and Ryzen 7 7700 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B800 and Ryzen 7 7700.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes1624

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron B800 663
Ryzen 7 7700 34644
+5125%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron B800 247
Ryzen 7 7700 2874
+1064%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron B800 414
Ryzen 7 7700 14921
+3504%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron B800 1910
Ryzen 7 7700 8345
+337%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron B800 3779
Ryzen 7 7700 53881
+1326%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron B800 1534
Ryzen 7 7700 18277
+1091%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron B800 47
Ryzen 7 7700 2.72
+1628%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 June 2011 14 January 2023
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron B800 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 7700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron B800 and Ryzen 7 7700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron B800 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 7700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B800 and Ryzen 7 7700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B800
Celeron B800
AMD Ryzen 7 7700
Ryzen 7 7700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 192 votes

Rate Celeron B800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 1423 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron B800 or Ryzen 7 7700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.