FX-6120 vs Celeron B800

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron B800
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.42
FX-6120
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.45
+483%

FX-6120 outperforms Celeron B800 by a whopping 483% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron B800 and FX-6120 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29891767
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency1.142.44
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date19 June 2011 (13 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron B800 and FX-6120 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads26
Base clock speedno data3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache128 KB288 KB
L2 cache512 KB6 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size131 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B800 and FX-6120 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketG2 (988B)AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B800 and FX-6120. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Celeron B800 and FX-6120 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B800 and FX-6120 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B800 and FX-6120. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B800 and FX-6120.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron B800 0.42
FX-6120 2.45
+483%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron B800 663
FX-6120 3899
+488%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron B800 247
FX-6120 517
+109%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron B800 416
FX-6120 1890
+354%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 2.45
Recency 19 June 2011 23 October 2012
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 6
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

Celeron B800 has 171.4% lower power consumption.

FX-6120, on the other hand, has a 483.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

The FX-6120 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron B800 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron B800 is a notebook processor while FX-6120 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B800 and FX-6120, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B800
Celeron B800
AMD FX-6120
FX-6120

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 193 votes

Rate Celeron B800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 35 votes

Rate FX-6120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron B800 or FX-6120, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.