Atom Z2760 vs Celeron B800

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron B800
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.42
+121%
Atom Z2760
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 3 Watt
0.19

Celeron B800 outperforms Atom Z2760 by a whopping 121% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron B800 and Atom Z2760 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29743237
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency1.145.99
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Cloverview (2012)
Release date19 June 2011 (13 years ago)27 September 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron B800 and Atom Z2760 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.5 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size131 mm265 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million140 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B800 and Atom Z2760 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCPGA988FC-MB4760
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B800 and Atom Z2760. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron B800 and Atom Z2760 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B800 and Atom Z2760 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B800 and Atom Z2760. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2
Maximum memory size16 GB2.4 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel ProcessorsPowerVR SGX545 (533 MHz)
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron B800 and Atom Z2760 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B800 and Atom Z2760.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron B800 0.42
+121%
Atom Z2760 0.19

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron B800 663
+122%
Atom Z2760 298

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron B800 1910
+218%
Atom Z2760 602

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron B800 3779
+123%
Atom Z2760 1697

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron B800 1534
+62.3%
Atom Z2760 945

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron B800 47
+23.7%
Atom Z2760 58.13

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 0.19
Recency 19 June 2011 27 September 2012
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 3 Watt

Celeron B800 has a 121.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom Z2760, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more threads, and 1066.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron B800 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z2760 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B800 and Atom Z2760, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B800
Celeron B800
Intel Atom Z2760
Atom Z2760

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 192 votes

Rate Celeron B800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 15 votes

Rate Atom Z2760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron B800 or Atom Z2760, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.