Apple M1 Max vs Celeron B710

Primary details

Comparing Celeron B710 and Apple M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated526
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronApple M-Series
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)no data
Release date19 June 2011 (13 years ago)18 October 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron B710 and Apple M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads110
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.06 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.22 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier16no data
L1 cache64K (per core)2.9 MB
L2 cache256K (per core)28 MB
L3 cache1.5 MB (shared)48 MB
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million57000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B710 and Apple M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketPGA988,PPGA988no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt2060 ‑ 3220 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B710 and Apple M1 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron B710 and Apple M1 Max technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B710 and Apple M1 Max are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B710 and Apple M1 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsApple M1 Max 32-Core GPU
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron B710 and Apple M1 Max integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B710 and Apple M1 Max.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron B710 106
Apple M1 Max 22081
+20731%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 June 2011 18 October 2021
Physical cores 1 10
Threads 1 10
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 2060 Watt

Celeron B710 has 5785.7% lower power consumption.

Apple M1 Max, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron B710 and Apple M1 Max. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B710 and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B710
Celeron B710
Apple M1 Max
M1 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 84 votes

Rate Celeron B710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 684 votes

Rate Apple M1 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron B710 or Apple M1 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.