Ryzen Threadripper 1955 vs Celeron 947UE
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 947UE and Ryzen Threadripper 1955 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 20 January 2013 (11 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 947UE and Ryzen Threadripper 1955 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 1024 KB | 32768 KB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 118 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 947UE and Ryzen Threadripper 1955 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA1023 | SP3r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 947UE and Ryzen Threadripper 1955. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 947UE and Ryzen Threadripper 1955 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 947UE and Ryzen Threadripper 1955. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 10 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 125 Watt |
Celeron 947UE has 635.3% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 1955, on the other hand, has 900% more physical cores, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 947UE and Ryzen Threadripper 1955. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 947UE is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1955 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 947UE and Ryzen Threadripper 1955, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
