Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G vs Celeron 925

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 925
2011
35 Watt
0.30
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
10.18
+3293%

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms Celeron 925 by a whopping 3293% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 925 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3100759
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency0.8114.82
Architecture codenameno dataRenoir (2020−2023)
Release date1 January 2011 (13 years ago)21 July 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 925 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data6 (Hexa-Core)
Threadsno data12
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.2 GHz
Multiplierno data37
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 925 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataAM4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 925 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data

Security technologies

Celeron 925 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 925 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 925 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Vega 7

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 925 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 925 0.30
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G 10.18
+3293%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 925 477
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G 16166
+3289%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.30 10.18
Recency 1 January 2011 21 July 2020
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron 925 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G, on the other hand, has a 3293.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 925 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 925 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 925 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 925
Celeron 925
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 925 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1614 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 925 or Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.