VIA C3 Processor 1.0 vs Celeron 900
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 900 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | no data | Ezra-T (2002) |
| Release date | 1 January 2009 (15 years ago) | 3 June 2002 (22 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $62 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 900 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 64 KB |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | no data | 56 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 16 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 900 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PGA478 | 370 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 900 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron 900 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 900 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2009 | 3 June 2002 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
Celeron 900 has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 188.9% more advanced lithography process.
VIA C3 Processor 1.0, on the other hand, has 250% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 900 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 900 is a notebook processor while VIA C3 Processor 1.0 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 900 and VIA C3 Processor 1.0, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
