Ryzen 9 7945HX vs Celeron 900

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 900 and Ryzen 9 7945HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated110
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiencyno data59.21
Architecture codenameno dataDragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 900 and Ryzen 9 7945HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threadsno data32
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speedno data5.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nmCCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm
Die sizeno data2x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 900 and Ryzen 9 7945HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA478FL1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 900 and Ryzen 9 7945HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron 900 and Ryzen 9 7945HX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 900 and Ryzen 9 7945HX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 900 and Ryzen 9 7945HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 610M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 900 and Ryzen 9 7945HX.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data28

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 900 410
Ryzen 9 7945HX 54668
+13234%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 900 224
Ryzen 9 7945HX 2735
+1121%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 900 237
Ryzen 9 7945HX 15896
+6607%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2009 4 January 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 55 Watt

Celeron 900 has 57.1% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 7945HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 900 and Ryzen 9 7945HX. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 900 and Ryzen 9 7945HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 900
Celeron 900
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
Ryzen 9 7945HX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 54 votes

Rate Celeron 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 619 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7945HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 900 or Ryzen 9 7945HX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.