M3-8100Y vs Celeron 887E

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 887E and M3-8100Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Core M3
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Amber Lake (2018−2019)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)28 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$281

Detailed specifications

Celeron 887E and M3-8100Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz1.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0OPI
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s4 GT/s
Multiplier1516
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache2 MB4 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Number of transistors504 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 887E and M3-8100Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 887E and M3-8100Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 887E and M3-8100Y are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 887E and M3-8100Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333DDR3L-1600
Maximum memory size16 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s29.861 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)Intel UHD Graphics 615

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 887E and M3-8100Y.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data10

Pros & cons summary


Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 5 Watt

M3-8100Y has 100% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 240% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 887E and M3-8100Y. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 887E and M3-8100Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 887E
Celeron 887E
Intel M3-8100Y
M3-8100Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 887E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 11 votes

Rate M3-8100Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 887E or M3-8100Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.