Xeon w9-3575X vs Celeron 887

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 887
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.47
Xeon w9-3575X
2024
44 cores / 88 threads, 340 Watt
52.02
+10968%

Xeon w9-3575X outperforms Celeron 887 by a whopping 10968% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 887 and Xeon w9-3575X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking291930
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data33.96
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency2.6214.48
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date1 September 2012 (12 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$3,789

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 887 and Xeon w9-3575X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)44
Threads288
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)97.5 MB
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size131 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 887 and Xeon w9-3575X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1023FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt340 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 887 and Xeon w9-3575X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron 887 and Xeon w9-3575X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 887 and Xeon w9-3575X are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 887 and Xeon w9-3575X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size16 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel ProcessorsN/A
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 887 and Xeon w9-3575X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 887 and Xeon w9-3575X.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes16112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 887 0.47
Xeon w9-3575X 52.02
+10968%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 887 754
Xeon w9-3575X 82624
+10858%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.47 52.02
Recency 1 September 2012 24 August 2024
Physical cores 2 44
Threads 2 88
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 340 Watt

Celeron 887 has 1900% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3575X, on the other hand, has a 10968.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and 2100% more physical cores and 4300% more threads.

The Xeon w9-3575X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 887 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 887 is a notebook processor while Xeon w9-3575X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 887 and Xeon w9-3575X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 887
Celeron 887
Intel Xeon w9-3575X
Xeon w9-3575X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 17 votes

Rate Celeron 887 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w9-3575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 887 or Xeon w9-3575X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.