N100 vs Celeron 887

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 887
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.48
N100
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
3.45
+619%

N100 outperforms Celeron 887 by a whopping 619% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 887 and N100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29141557
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency2.6754.42
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)no data
Release date1 September 2012 (12 years ago)1 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 887 and N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache2 MB (shared)6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 887 and N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1023FCBGA1264
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 887 and N100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
GPIOno data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 887 and N100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 887 and N100 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 887 and N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size16 GB16 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequency1 GHz750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data24

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 887 and N100 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 887 and N100 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 887 and N100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 887 and N100.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes169
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 887 0.48
N100 3.45
+619%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 887 762
N100 5478
+619%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.48 3.45
Integrated graphics card 0.77 5.59
Recency 1 September 2012 1 January 2023
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 6 Watt

N100 has a 618.8% higher aggregate performance score, 626% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 183.3% lower power consumption.

The N100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 887 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 887 and N100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 887
Celeron 887
Intel N100
N100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 17 votes

Rate Celeron 887 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 188 votes

Rate N100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 887 or N100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.