i7-2649M vs Celeron 887

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 887 and Core i7-2649M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2920not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Core i7
Power efficiency2.62no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date1 September 2012 (12 years ago)3 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$346

Detailed specifications

Celeron 887 and Core i7-2649M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0DMI 2.0
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplier1523
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size131 mm2149 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors504 million624 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 887 and Core i7-2649M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1023FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 887 and Core i7-2649M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® AVX
AES-NI-+
FMA++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-+
Turbo Boost Technology-+
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Demand Based Switching--
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Celeron 887 and Core i7-2649M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theft-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 887 and Core i7-2649M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 887 and Core i7-2649M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB8.01 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics 3000
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency1 GHz1.1 GHz
InTru 3D-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 887 and Core i7-2649M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
SDVO++
CRT++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 887 and Core i7-2649M.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 0.77 0.66
Recency 1 September 2012 3 January 2011
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 25 Watt

Celeron 887 has 16.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and 47.1% lower power consumption.

i7-2649M, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 887 and Core i7-2649M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 887 and Core i7-2649M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 887
Celeron 887
Intel Core i7-2649M
Core i7-2649M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 17 votes

Rate Celeron 887 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i7-2649M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 887 or Core i7-2649M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.