Atom D525 vs Celeron 877

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 877
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.44
+76%
Atom D525
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 13 Watt
0.25

Celeron 877 outperforms Atom D525 by an impressive 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 877 and Atom D525 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29603162
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Atom
Power efficiency2.451.82
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Pinetrail (2009−2011)
Release date1 July 2012 (12 years ago)21 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$63

Detailed specifications

Celeron 877 and Atom D525 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.4 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz1.83 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier14no data
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size131 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors504 million176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 877 and Atom D525 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1023FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt13 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 877 and Atom D525. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching--
PAEno data32 Bit
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 877 and Atom D525 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 877 and Atom D525 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 877 and Atom D525. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB4 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel GMA 3150
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 877 and Atom D525 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 877 and Atom D525.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 877 0.44
+76%
Atom D525 0.25

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 877 693
+71.5%
Atom D525 404

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 877 242
+214%
Atom D525 77

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 877 457
+144%
Atom D525 187

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Celeron 877 1
+87.7%
Atom D525 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.44 0.25
Integrated graphics card 0.77 0.01
Recency 1 July 2012 21 June 2010
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 13 Watt

Celeron 877 has a 76% higher aggregate performance score, 7600% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Atom D525, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and 30.8% lower power consumption.

The Celeron 877 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom D525 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 877 and Atom D525, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 877
Celeron 877
Intel Atom D525
Atom D525

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 17 votes

Rate Celeron 877 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 218 votes

Rate Atom D525 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 877 or Atom D525, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.