Processor U300 vs Celeron 867

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 867 and Processor U300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3042not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Raptor Lake-U
Power efficiency1.95no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Raptor Lake-U (2023)
Release date1 January 2012 (12 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$134$193

Detailed specifications

Celeron 867 and Processor U300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)5 (Penta-Core)
Threads26
Base clock speed1.3 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s55 MHz
Multiplier13no data
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 867 and Processor U300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketIntel BGA1023Intel BGA 1744
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 867 and Processor U300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 867 and Processor U300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 867 and Processor U300 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 867 and Processor U300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ( - 1100 MHz)
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 867 and Processor U300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 867 and Processor U300.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes168

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 0.77 4.55
Recency 1 January 2012 4 January 2023
Physical cores 2 5
Threads 2 6
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 15 Watt

Processor U300 has 490.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 years, 150% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 13.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 867 and Processor U300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 867 and Processor U300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 867
Celeron 867
Intel Processor U300
Processor U300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron 867 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 12 votes

Rate Processor U300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 867 or Processor U300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.