Xeon Platinum 8362 vs Celeron 857

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 857 and Xeon Platinum 8362 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1123
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiencyno data2.05
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date1 July 2011 (13 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$134no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 857 and Xeon Platinum 8362 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 857 and Xeon Platinum 8362 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCBGA1023FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt265 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 857 and Xeon Platinum 8362. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron 857 and Xeon Platinum 8362 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 857 and Xeon Platinum 8362 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 857 and Xeon Platinum 8362. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16 GB6 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 857 and Xeon Platinum 8362 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 857 and Xeon Platinum 8362.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes1664

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 857 569
Xeon Platinum 8362 9107
+1501%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2011 6 April 2021
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 265 Watt

Celeron 857 has 1458.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8362, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 857 and Xeon Platinum 8362. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 857 is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8362 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 857 and Xeon Platinum 8362, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 857
Celeron 857
Intel Xeon Platinum 8362
Xeon Platinum 8362

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Celeron 857 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8362 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 857 or Xeon Platinum 8362, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.