Ryzen 3 3200G vs Celeron 857
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 857 and Ryzen 3 3200G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1313 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 29 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 8.90 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron | AMD Ryzen 3 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 6.54 |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Picasso (2019−2022) |
| Release date | 1 July 2011 (13 years ago) | 7 July 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $134 | $99 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron 857 and Ryzen 3 3200G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 12 | 36 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | 131 mm2 | 210 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 504 million | 4,940 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 857 and Ryzen 3 3200G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCBGA1023 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 857 and Ryzen 3 3200G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| My WiFi | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FDI | + | no data |
| Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron 857 and Ryzen 3 3200G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 857 and Ryzen 3 3200G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 857 and Ryzen 3 3200G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | 46.933 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) |
| Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 857 and Ryzen 3 3200G integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
| SDVO | + | no data |
| CRT | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 857 and Ryzen 3 3200G.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 July 2011 | 7 July 2019 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 65 Watt |
Celeron 857 has 282.4% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 3 3200G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 857 and Ryzen 3 3200G. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 857 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 3200G is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 857 and Ryzen 3 3200G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
