Xeon Platinum 8571N vs Celeron 847E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 847E
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.37
Xeon Platinum 8571N
2023
52 cores / 104 threads, 300 Watt
43.05
+11535%

Xeon Platinum 8571N outperforms Celeron 847E by a whopping 11535% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 847E and Xeon Platinum 8571N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking303054
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.42
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency2.0613.58
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$111$6,839

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 847E and Xeon Platinum 8571N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)52
Threads2104
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.1 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier11no data
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB300 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size131 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
Number of transistors504 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 847E and Xeon Platinum 8571N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataFCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 847E and Xeon Platinum 8571N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron 847E and Xeon Platinum 8571N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 847E and Xeon Platinum 8571N are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 847E and Xeon Platinum 8571N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC)
Maximum memory size16 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 847E and Xeon Platinum 8571N.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 847E 0.37
Xeon Platinum 8571N 43.05
+11535%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 847E 584
Xeon Platinum 8571N 68385
+11610%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.37 43.05
Physical cores 2 52
Threads 2 104
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 300 Watt

Celeron 847E has 1664.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8571N, on the other hand, has a 11535.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 2500% more physical cores and 5100% more threads.

The Xeon Platinum 8571N is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 847E in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 847E is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8571N is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 847E and Xeon Platinum 8571N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 847E
Celeron 847E
Intel Xeon Platinum 8571N
Xeon Platinum 8571N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Celeron 847E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Platinum 8571N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 847E or Xeon Platinum 8571N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.