Ryzen 7 7700X vs Celeron 847E
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 847E and Ryzen 7 7700X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 229 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 97 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 43.59 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron | AMD Ryzen 7 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 20.41 |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 27 September 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $111 | $399 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron 847E and Ryzen 7 7700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 4.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 11 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Die size | 131 mm2 | 70 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 61 °C |
| Number of transistors | 504 Million | 6,570 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 847E and Ryzen 7 7700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 105 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 847E and Ryzen 7 7700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 5 nm, 0.650 - 1.475V |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 847E and Ryzen 7 7700X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 847E and Ryzen 7 7700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1333 | DDR5-5200 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 847E and Ryzen 7 7700X.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 24 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 105 Watt |
Celeron 847E has 517.6% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 7700X, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 847E and Ryzen 7 7700X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 847E is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 7700X is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 847E and Ryzen 7 7700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
