Ryzen 3 7440U vs Celeron 847

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 847 and Ryzen 3 7440U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated921
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiencyno data27.65
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Phoenix-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023)
Release date19 June 2011 (13 years ago)3 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$134no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 847 and Ryzen 3 7440U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed1.1 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.1 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier11no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size131 mm2137 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors504 million20,900 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 847 and Ryzen 3 7440U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1023FP7
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 847 and Ryzen 3 7440U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron 847 and Ryzen 3 7440U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 847 and Ryzen 3 7440U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 847 and Ryzen 3 7440U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)AMD Radeon 740M
Graphics max frequency800 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 847 and Ryzen 3 7440U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 847 and Ryzen 3 7440U.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes1614

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 847 478
Ryzen 3 7440U 12991
+2618%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 June 2011 3 May 2023
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 28 Watt

Celeron 847 has 64.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 3 7440U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 847 and Ryzen 3 7440U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 847 and Ryzen 3 7440U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 847
Celeron 847
AMD Ryzen 3 7440U
Ryzen 3 7440U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 384 votes

Rate Celeron 847 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 18 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 7440U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 847 or Ryzen 3 7440U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.