Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Celeron 837

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 837 and Iris Pro Graphics 580 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Iris Graphics
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Gen9
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 837 and Iris Pro Graphics 580 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads2no data
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz0.35 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier18no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache2 MBno data
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm
Die size131 mm2no data
Number of transistors504 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 837 and Iris Pro Graphics 580 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
Power consumption (TDP)17 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 837 and Iris Pro Graphics 580. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 837 and Iris Pro Graphics 580 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 837 and Iris Pro Graphics 580. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333no data
Maximum memory size16 GB65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm

Iris Pro Graphics 580 has a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 837 and Iris Pro Graphics 580. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 837 and Iris Pro Graphics 580, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 837
Celeron 837
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
Iris Pro Graphics 580

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Celeron 837 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 5 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 837 or Iris Pro Graphics 580, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.