i7-6870HQ vs Celeron 827E
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 827E and Core i7-6870HQ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3171 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Celeron | Intel Core i7 |
Power efficiency | 1.28 | no data |
Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 2 January 2016 (8 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $89 | $434 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 827E and Core i7-6870HQ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 8 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.7 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 2.0 | DMI 3.0 |
Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | 4 × 8 GT/s |
Multiplier | 14 | 27 |
L1 cache | 64 KB | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 256 KB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 1.5 MB | 8 MB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 131 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Number of transistors | 504 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 827E and Core i7-6870HQ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | no data | FCBGA1440 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 827E and Core i7-6870HQ. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
eDRAM | no data | 128 MB |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Smart Response | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron 827E and Core i7-6870HQ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
MPX | - | + |
SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 827E and Core i7-6870HQ are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 827E and Core i7-6870HQ. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-1066 | DDR3, DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 64 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | 34.134 GB/s |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 |
Max video memory | no data | 64 GB |
Quick Sync Video | - | + |
Clear Video HD | no data | + |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 1 GHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 827E and Core i7-6870HQ integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
eDP | no data | + |
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
DVI | no data | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 827E and Core i7-6870HQ integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | no data | + |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096x2304@24Hz |
Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron 827E and Core i7-6870HQ integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | 12 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 827E and Core i7-6870HQ.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 0.34 | 4.77 |
Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
Threads | 1 | 8 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 45 Watt |
Celeron 827E has 164.7% lower power consumption.
i7-6870HQ, on the other hand, has 1302.9% faster integrated GPU, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 827E and Core i7-6870HQ. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 827E and Core i7-6870HQ, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.