Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 vs Celeron 827
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 827 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| Release date | no data | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 827 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 14 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 1.5 MB | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 131 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 504 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 827 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FP11 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 827 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 827 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 827 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1333 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | Radeon 8050S |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 827 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 55 Watt |
Celeron 827 has 223.5% lower power consumption.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 827 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
