Ultra 9 285K vs Celeron 807UE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 807UE
1 core / 1 thread, 10 Watt
0.15
Core Ultra 9 285K
2024
24 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
43.06
+28607%

Core Ultra 9 285K outperforms Celeron 807UE by a whopping 28607% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 807UE and Core Ultra 9 285K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking331153
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data74.28
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency1.4132.43
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 807UE and Core Ultra 9 285K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speedno data3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s250 MHz
Multiplier10no data
L1 cache64 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache1.5 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm3 nm
Die size131 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors504 Million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 807UE and Core Ultra 9 285K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno data1851
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 807UE and Core Ultra 9 285K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX-+

Security technologies

Celeron 807UE and Core Ultra 9 285K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 807UE and Core Ultra 9 285K are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 807UE and Core Ultra 9 285K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333DDR5 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size4 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth10.662 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 807UE and Core Ultra 9 285K.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 807UE 0.15
Ultra 9 285K 43.06
+28607%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 807UE 241
Ultra 9 285K 68403
+28283%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.15 43.06
Physical cores 1 24
Threads 1 24
Chip lithography 32 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 125 Watt

Celeron 807UE has 1150% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 285K, on the other hand, has a 28606.7% higher aggregate performance score, 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 966.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 9 285K is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 807UE in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 807UE is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 807UE and Core Ultra 9 285K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 807UE
Celeron 807UE
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 807UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 159 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 807UE or Core Ultra 9 285K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.