3020e vs Celeron 6205
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 6205 and 3020e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 2121 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Tiger Lake | AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 24.15 |
| Architecture codename | Tiger Lake U (2020) | Dali (Zen) (2020) |
| Release date | 1 September 2020 (4 years ago) | 4 August 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 6205 and 3020e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2/2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 160 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 2.5 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 6205 and 3020e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA1499 | FT5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 6205 and 3020e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 6205 and 3020e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 4.55 | 2.98 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 6 Watt |
Celeron 6205 has 52.7% faster integrated GPU, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
3020e, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 6205 and 3020e. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 6205 and 3020e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
