Ryzen 3 7440U vs Celeron 450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 450
2008
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.27
Ryzen 3 7440U
2023
4 cores / 8 threads, 28 Watt
8.18
+2930%

Ryzen 3 7440U outperforms Celeron 450 by a whopping 2930% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 450 and Ryzen 3 7440U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3140930
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency0.7327.65
Architecture codenameConroe-L (2007−2008)Phoenix-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023)
Release dateAugust 2008 (16 years ago)3 May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 450 and Ryzen 3 7440U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm4 nm
Die size77 mm2137 mm2
Maximum core temperature60 °C100 °C
Number of transistors105 million20,900 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 450 and Ryzen 3 7440U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FP7
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 450 and Ryzen 3 7440U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataAES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron 450 and Ryzen 3 7440U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 450 and Ryzen 3 7440U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 450 and Ryzen 3 7440U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 740M ( - 2500 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 450 and Ryzen 3 7440U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data14

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 450 0.27
Ryzen 3 7440U 8.18
+2930%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 450 433
Ryzen 3 7440U 12991
+2900%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 8.18
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 3 7440U has a 2929.6% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 1525% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 7440U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 450 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron 450 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 7440U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 450 and Ryzen 3 7440U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 450
Celeron 450
AMD Ryzen 3 7440U
Ryzen 3 7440U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 44 votes

Rate Celeron 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 18 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 7440U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 450 or Ryzen 3 7440U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.