EPYC 75F3 vs Celeron 450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 450 and EPYC 75F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated51
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.97
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data14.57
Architecture codenameConroe-L (2007−2008)Milan (2021−2023)
Release dateAugust 2008 (16 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,860

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 450 and EPYC 75F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.95 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz4 GHz
Multiplierno data29.5
L1 cache64 KB2 MB
L2 cache512 KB16 MB
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm+
Die size77 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature60 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 450 and EPYC 75F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketLGA775SP3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 450 and EPYC 75F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron 450 and EPYC 75F3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 450 and EPYC 75F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 450 and EPYC 75F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 450 and EPYC 75F3.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 450 426
EPYC 75F3 68505
+15981%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 450 159
EPYC 75F3 1826
+1048%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 450 161
EPYC 75F3 16432
+10106%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 32
Threads 1 64
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 280 Watt

Celeron 450 has 700% lower power consumption.

EPYC 75F3, on the other hand, has 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 450 and EPYC 75F3. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron 450 is a desktop processor while EPYC 75F3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 450 and EPYC 75F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 450
Celeron 450
AMD EPYC 75F3
EPYC 75F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 44 votes

Rate Celeron 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 75F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 450 or EPYC 75F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.