i9-10900F vs Celeron 450

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 450 and Core i9-10900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated608
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data18.27
Architecture codenameConroe-L (2007−2008)Comet Lake (2020)
Release dateAugust 2008 (16 years ago)30 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 450 and Core i9-10900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads120
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size77 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature60 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors105 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 450 and Core i9-10900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 450 and Core i9-10900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron 450 and Core i9-10900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 450 and Core i9-10900F are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 450 and Core i9-10900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data45.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 450 and Core i9-10900F.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 450 426
i9-10900F 19938
+4580%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 450 159
i9-10900F 1706
+973%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 450 161
i9-10900F 8454
+5151%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 10
Threads 1 20
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron 450 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

i9-10900F, on the other hand, has 900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 450 and Core i9-10900F. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 450 and Core i9-10900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 450
Celeron 450
Intel Core i9-10900F
Core i9-10900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 44 votes

Rate Celeron 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 334 votes

Rate Core i9-10900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 450 or Core i9-10900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.