Ryzen 3 3250U vs Celeron 440

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 440 and Ryzen 3 3250U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1762
Place by popularitynot in top-10078
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiencyno data15.14
Architecture codenameConroe-L (2007−2008)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release dateJune 2007 (17 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$40no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 440 and Ryzen 3 3250U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads14
Base clock speed2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplierno data26
L1 cache64 KB192 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size77 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature60 °C95 °C
Number of transistors105 million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 440 and Ryzen 3 3250U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 440 and Ryzen 3 3250U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron 440 and Ryzen 3 3250U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 440 and Ryzen 3 3250U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 440 and Ryzen 3 3250U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 440 and Ryzen 3 3250U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 440 368
Ryzen 3 3250U 3811
+936%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 3 3250U has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 440 and Ryzen 3 3250U. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron 440 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 3250U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 440 and Ryzen 3 3250U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 440
Celeron 440
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Ryzen 3 3250U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 58 votes

Rate Celeron 440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 2108 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3250U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 440 or Ryzen 3 3250U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.