EPYC 9555 vs Celeron 4305UE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 4305UE
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.06
EPYC 9555
2024
64 cores / 128 threads, 360 Watt
83.20
+7749%

EPYC 9555 outperforms Celeron 4305UE by a whopping 7749% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 4305UE and EPYC 9555 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24466
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.05
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency6.7322.02
Architecture codenameWhiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)Turin (2024)
Release date1 October 2018 (6 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$9,826

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 4305UE and EPYC 9555 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2128
Base clock speedno data3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data8x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 4305UE and EPYC 9555 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketIntel BGA 1528SP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 4305UE and EPYC 9555. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 4305UE and EPYC 9555 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 4305UE and EPYC 9555. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 610N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 4305UE and EPYC 9555.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 4305UE 1.06
EPYC 9555 83.20
+7749%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 4305UE 1699
EPYC 9555 133253
+7743%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.06 83.20
Recency 1 October 2018 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 2 128
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 360 Watt

Celeron 4305UE has 2300% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9555, on the other hand, has a 7749.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9555 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 4305UE in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 4305UE is a notebook processor while EPYC 9555 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 4305UE and EPYC 9555, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 4305UE
Celeron 4305UE
AMD EPYC 9555
EPYC 9555

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 4305UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 9555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 4305UE or EPYC 9555, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.