Opteron X2 275 vs Celeron 430
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 430 and Opteron X2 275 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3260 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
Power efficiency | 0.49 | no data |
Architecture codename | Conroe-L (2007−2008) | Italy (2005−2006) |
Release date | June 2007 (17 years ago) | May 2005 (19 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $50 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 430 and Opteron X2 275 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 1 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
Die size | 77 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 60 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 105 million | 233 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | 1V-1.3375V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 430 and Opteron X2 275 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
Socket | LGA775 | 940 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 430 and Opteron X2 275. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | - | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron 430 and Opteron X2 275 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 430 and Opteron X2 275 are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 430 and Opteron X2 275. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
Threads | 1 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 95 Watt |
Celeron 430 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.
Opteron X2 275, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 430 and Opteron X2 275. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron 430 is a desktop processor while Opteron X2 275 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 430 and Opteron X2 275, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.