Opteron X2 275 vs Celeron 430

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 430 and Opteron X2 275 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameConroe-L (2007−2008)Italy (2005−2006)
Release dateJune 2007 (17 years ago)May 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$50no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 430 and Opteron X2 275 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
Die size77 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature60 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 million233 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 430 and Opteron X2 275 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketLGA775940
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 430 and Opteron X2 275. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron 430 and Opteron X2 275 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 430 and Opteron X2 275 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 430 and Opteron X2 275. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

Celeron 430 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

Opteron X2 275, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 430 and Opteron X2 275. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron 430 is a desktop processor while Opteron X2 275 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 430 and Opteron X2 275, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 430
Celeron 430
AMD Opteron X2 275
Opteron X2 275

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 159 votes

Rate Celeron 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron X2 275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 430 or Opteron X2 275, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.