Xeon w9-3575X vs Celeron 3765U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 3765U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.79
Xeon w9-3575X
2024
44 cores / 88 threads, 340 Watt
52.02
+6485%

Xeon w9-3575X outperforms Celeron 3765U by a whopping 6485% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 3765U and Xeon w9-3575X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking261530
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data34.04
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency4.9814.48
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date1 June 2015 (9 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$3,789

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3765U and Xeon w9-3575X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)44
Threads288
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB97.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size82 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
Number of transistors1300 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3765U and Xeon w9-3575X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1168FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt340 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3765U and Xeon w9-3575X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron 3765U and Xeon w9-3575X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXno data-
OS Guard-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3765U and Xeon w9-3575X are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3765U and Xeon w9-3575X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size16 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® ProcessorsN/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency850 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3765U and Xeon w9-3575X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3765U and Xeon w9-3575X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3765U and Xeon w9-3575X.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes12112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 3765U 0.79
Xeon w9-3575X 52.02
+6485%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 3765U 1252
Xeon w9-3575X 82624
+6499%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.79 52.02
Recency 1 June 2015 24 August 2024
Physical cores 2 44
Threads 2 88
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 340 Watt

Celeron 3765U has 2166.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3575X, on the other hand, has a 6484.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and 2100% more physical cores and 4300% more threads.

The Xeon w9-3575X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3765U in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 3765U is a notebook processor while Xeon w9-3575X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3765U and Xeon w9-3575X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3765U
Celeron 3765U
Intel Xeon w9-3575X
Xeon w9-3575X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 3765U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w9-3575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 3765U or Xeon w9-3575X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.