EPYC 9475F vs Celeron 3765U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 3765U and EPYC 9475F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2613not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency4.95no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Turin (2024)
Release date1 June 2015 (9 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$7,592

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3765U and EPYC 9475F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads296
Base clock speed1.9 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size82 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1300 Million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3765U and EPYC 9475F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1168SP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3765U and EPYC 9475F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron 3765U and EPYC 9475F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3765U and EPYC 9475F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3765U and EPYC 9475F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® ProcessorsN/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency850 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3765U and EPYC 9475F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3765U and EPYC 9475F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3765U and EPYC 9475F.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes12128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2015 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 48
Threads 2 96
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 400 Watt

Celeron 3765U has 2566.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9475F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 3765U and EPYC 9475F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 3765U is a notebook processor while EPYC 9475F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3765U and EPYC 9475F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3765U
Celeron 3765U
AMD EPYC 9475F
EPYC 9475F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 3765U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9475F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 3765U or EPYC 9475F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.