Turion 64 ML-30 vs Celeron 3215U

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 3215U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.68
+325%
Turion 64 ML-30
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.16

Celeron 3215U outperforms Turion 64 ML-30 by a whopping 325% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 3215U and Turion 64 ML-30 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27523304
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronTurion 64
Power efficiency4.330.44
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Lancaster (2005−2006)
Release date1 June 2015 (9 years ago)March 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3215U and Turion 64 ML-30 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s800 MHz
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm90 nm
Die size82 mm2125 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1300 Million114 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3215U and Turion 64 ML-30 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1168754
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3215U and Turion 64 ML-30. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 3215U and Turion 64 ML-30 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3215U and Turion 64 ML-30 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3215U and Turion 64 ML-30. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel Processorsno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency850 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3215U and Turion 64 ML-30 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3215U and Turion 64 ML-30 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3215U and Turion 64 ML-30.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 0.16
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron 3215U has a 325% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Celeron 3215U is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 ML-30 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3215U and Turion 64 ML-30, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3215U
Celeron 3215U
AMD Turion 64 ML-30
Turion 64 ML-30

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 27 votes

Rate Celeron 3215U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 10 votes

Rate Turion 64 ML-30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 3215U or Turion 64 ML-30, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.