Phenom X4 9500 vs Celeron 2970M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 2970M
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 37 Watt
0.94
Phenom X4 9500
2007
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
0.98
+4.3%

Phenom X4 9500 outperforms Celeron 2970M by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 2970M and Phenom X4 9500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25022466
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency2.400.98
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Agena (2007−2008)
Release date14 April 2014 (10 years ago)November 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 2970M and Phenom X4 9500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm65 nm
Die size130 mm2285 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors960 Million450 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 2970M and Phenom X4 9500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA946AM2+
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 2970M and Phenom X4 9500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Celeron 2970M and Phenom X4 9500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 2970M and Phenom X4 9500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2970M and Phenom X4 9500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 2970M and Phenom X4 9500 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
VGA+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 2970M and Phenom X4 9500.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 2970M 0.94
Phenom X4 9500 0.98
+4.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 2970M 1501
Phenom X4 9500 1564
+4.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.94 0.98
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 95 Watt

Celeron 2970M has a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 156.8% lower power consumption.

Phenom X4 9500, on the other hand, has a 4.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron 2970M and Phenom X4 9500.

Be aware that Celeron 2970M is a notebook processor while Phenom X4 9500 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 2970M and Phenom X4 9500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 2970M
Celeron 2970M
AMD Phenom X4 9500
Phenom X4 9500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 2970M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 54 votes

Rate Phenom X4 9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 2970M or Phenom X4 9500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.