Athlon 3000G vs Celeron 2957U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 2957U
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.56

Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron 2957U by a whopping 423% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 2957U and Athlon 3000G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28351667
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.27
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Athlon
Power efficiency3.407.63
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date1 January 2014 (10 years ago)7 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$49

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 2957U and Athlon 3000G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.4 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache128 KB192 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache2 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data209.78 mm2?
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 2957U and Athlon 3000G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1168AM4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 2957U and Athlon 3000G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect+no data
FDI-no data
AMT9.5no data
Matrix Storage-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron 2957U and Athlon 3000G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 2957U and Athlon 3000G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2957U and Athlon 3000G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size16 GB64 GB?
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s42.671 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 2957U and Athlon 3000G integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 2957U and Athlon 3000G.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes106
PCI support-no data
USB revision3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Integrated IDE-no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 2957U 0.56
Athlon 3000G 2.93
+423%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 2957U 855
Athlon 3000G 4482
+424%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.56 2.93
Recency 1 January 2014 7 November 2019
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron 2957U has 133.3% lower power consumption.

Athlon 3000G, on the other hand, has a 423.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Athlon 3000G is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 2957U in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 2957U is a notebook processor while Athlon 3000G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 2957U and Athlon 3000G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 2957U
Celeron 2957U
AMD Athlon 3000G
Athlon 3000G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 70 votes

Rate Celeron 2957U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2077 votes

Rate Athlon 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 2957U or Athlon 3000G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.